Intellium AI
AIPOWER: DECIDE WITH AGENTIC AI00/05

Agents propose. Commanders decide.

Agentic course-of-action generation under command: AI agents draft and argue options; deterministic code verifies every claim; a human signs the decision.

THE DECISION PROBLEM01/05

The commander needs courses of action. The staff produce them by hand, over days. When tempo accelerates, the estimate process becomes the bottleneck.

Manual planning is slow, hard to verify and leaves no audit trail. AiPower works the planning problem the way a staff does, and verifies every claim.

CAPABILITIES02/05

The rule is enforced in software, not by trust.

AiSource screen: Propose

1.Propose

Set the mission, clock and thresholds. One planner agent per stance drafts a complete course of action.

AiSource screen: Verify

2.Verify

Ten deterministic checks screen each draft. Survivors are scored against UK FACES, with the commander’s weights applied arithmetically and the working shown.

AiSource screen: Sign

3.Sign

Human edits face the same validators. Acceptance: two names, timestamped.

OUTPUT03/05

Every recommendation arrives with its evidence and its dissent.

Ranked, evidence-backed recommendation with confidence, dissent and sensitivity notes. Draft CONOPS, missions-and-tasks extracts, CONPLANs. Complete audit log.

A full three-option estimate in minutes, not days.

ASSURANCE04/05

Frontier agents inside an assurance harness.

Anyone can generate options; verifying every claim at machine speed is the hard part.

By design

6

planner stances

Each drafts a complete course of action: tempo, attrition, deception, manoeuvre, protection or firepower.

10

deterministic checks per draft

Every number is verified against calculator output. Unsupported figures are flagged, not deleted.

3

options per estimate

The commander gets three courses of action, with the evidence, confidence and dissent behind each.

2

names to accept

Acceptance takes the Chief of Staff and the Commander, timestamped into the decision record.